President Trump's unilateral extension of the April 7 US-Iran two-week ceasefire on April 21—citing Tehran's fractured leadership and at Pakistan's request—lacks mutual confirmation from Iran, sustaining de facto de-escalation under a persistent US naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. The US rejected Iran's April 28 proposal to halt hostilities and reopen the strait without nuclear concessions on April 29, amid reports of Iranian economic strain and contingency planning. A Trump-Putin call on April 30 endorsed prolonged talks but warned of severe global fallout from escalation. Traders eye Iran's revised proposal expected May 1 alongside the US War Powers Resolution deadline, which may trigger congressional review or renewed military action.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedUS x Iran ceasefire extended by...?
US x Iran ceasefire extended by...?
$258,677,095 Vol.
April 22
<1%
$258,677,095 Vol.
April 22
<1%
Both extensions of the April 7 ceasefire and new agreements for an extended ceasefire will qualify, even if a brief period occurs during which there is no formal ceasefire in effect after the expiration of the April 7 ceasefire.
If a qualifying agreement is officially reached before the resolution date, this market will resolve to “Yes,” regardless of whether the ceasefire extension ultimately takes effect.
An extension of the ceasefire agreement requires clear public confirmation from both the United States government and the government of Iran that they have agreed to halt military hostilities against one another for longer than the initially agreed two-week period, or for an official extension of the ceasefire agreement in place to be otherwise confirmed by an overwhelming consensus of media reporting.
Any form of informal understanding, backchannel communication, de-escalation, or unilateral pause in hostilities without a confirmed agreement on a qualifying extension will not qualify. Similarly, newly agreed-upon humanitarian pauses, limited operational pauses, or temporary tactical stand-downs will not qualify.
A newly agreed-upon broader peace deal will qualify if it includes a qualifying extension of the ceasefire agreement/halt in military hostilities. Agreements that outline future negotiations or de-escalation measures, but do not explicitly commit to extending the ceasefire, will not qualify.
This market’s resolution will be based on official statements from the United States government and the government of Iran. However, an overwhelming consensus of credible media reporting confirming that an official ceasefire extension agreement has been reached will suffice.
Market Opened: Apr 20, 2026, 3:34 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Outcome proposed: No
Disputed
Outcome proposed: No
Disputed
Final review
Both extensions of the April 7 ceasefire and new agreements for an extended ceasefire will qualify, even if a brief period occurs during which there is no formal ceasefire in effect after the expiration of the April 7 ceasefire.
If a qualifying agreement is officially reached before the resolution date, this market will resolve to “Yes,” regardless of whether the ceasefire extension ultimately takes effect.
An extension of the ceasefire agreement requires clear public confirmation from both the United States government and the government of Iran that they have agreed to halt military hostilities against one another for longer than the initially agreed two-week period, or for an official extension of the ceasefire agreement in place to be otherwise confirmed by an overwhelming consensus of media reporting.
Any form of informal understanding, backchannel communication, de-escalation, or unilateral pause in hostilities without a confirmed agreement on a qualifying extension will not qualify. Similarly, newly agreed-upon humanitarian pauses, limited operational pauses, or temporary tactical stand-downs will not qualify.
A newly agreed-upon broader peace deal will qualify if it includes a qualifying extension of the ceasefire agreement/halt in military hostilities. Agreements that outline future negotiations or de-escalation measures, but do not explicitly commit to extending the ceasefire, will not qualify.
This market’s resolution will be based on official statements from the United States government and the government of Iran. However, an overwhelming consensus of credible media reporting confirming that an official ceasefire extension agreement has been reached will suffice.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Outcome proposed: No
Disputed
Outcome proposed: No
Disputed
Final review
President Trump's unilateral extension of the April 7 US-Iran two-week ceasefire on April 21—citing Tehran's fractured leadership and at Pakistan's request—lacks mutual confirmation from Iran, sustaining de facto de-escalation under a persistent US naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. The US rejected Iran's April 28 proposal to halt hostilities and reopen the strait without nuclear concessions on April 29, amid reports of Iranian economic strain and contingency planning. A Trump-Putin call on April 30 endorsed prolonged talks but warned of severe global fallout from escalation. Traders eye Iran's revised proposal expected May 1 alongside the US War Powers Resolution deadline, which may trigger congressional review or renewed military action.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated



Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions