Trader consensus reflects an 89% implied probability against a federal law banning sports prediction markets in 2026, driven by stalled bipartisan legislation despite a March flurry of introductions, including Sens. Curtis (R-UT) and Schiff (D-CA)'s Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act prohibiting CFTC-approved sports event contracts and Sens. Merkley (D-OR) and Rep. Raskin's (D-MD) broader STOP Corrupt Bets Act targeting sports, elections, and military outcomes. None have advanced beyond committees amid CFTC withdrawal of event contract ban proposals in February, lawsuits preempting state gambling laws, and Trump administration support for platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket. State efforts, such as Minnesota's bill nearing Senate floor vote, face federal preemption hurdles, with divided Congress and filibuster risks limiting enactment prospects before year-end.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedLaw banning sports prediction markets enacted in 2026?
Law banning sports prediction markets enacted in 2026?
$10,248 Vol.
$10,248 Vol.
$10,248 Vol.
$10,248 Vol.
Any bill that prohibits federally regulated prediction markets from offering sports betting contracts, or otherwise places such activities under state-level gambling regulation rather than federal regulatory oversight, will qualify for a “Yes” resolution.
Qualifying legislation may include joint resolutions and must pass both the House and the Senate, and must be signed by the President, become law without signature while Congress remains in session, or become law through veto override. Presidential pocket vetoes that expire resolve to "No".
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the US federal government and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC); however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Market Opened: Mar 27, 2026, 1:53 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Any bill that prohibits federally regulated prediction markets from offering sports betting contracts, or otherwise places such activities under state-level gambling regulation rather than federal regulatory oversight, will qualify for a “Yes” resolution.
Qualifying legislation may include joint resolutions and must pass both the House and the Senate, and must be signed by the President, become law without signature while Congress remains in session, or become law through veto override. Presidential pocket vetoes that expire resolve to "No".
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the US federal government and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC); however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus reflects an 89% implied probability against a federal law banning sports prediction markets in 2026, driven by stalled bipartisan legislation despite a March flurry of introductions, including Sens. Curtis (R-UT) and Schiff (D-CA)'s Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act prohibiting CFTC-approved sports event contracts and Sens. Merkley (D-OR) and Rep. Raskin's (D-MD) broader STOP Corrupt Bets Act targeting sports, elections, and military outcomes. None have advanced beyond committees amid CFTC withdrawal of event contract ban proposals in February, lawsuits preempting state gambling laws, and Trump administration support for platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket. State efforts, such as Minnesota's bill nearing Senate floor vote, face federal preemption hurdles, with divided Congress and filibuster risks limiting enactment prospects before year-end.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated



Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions