US-brokered ambassador-level talks between Israel and Lebanon on April 14 and 23 in Washington marked rare direct diplomatic contacts since 1993, yielding a 10-day ceasefire extension to three weeks amid fragile border calm and Hezbollah threats. With Yes shares at 50.5%, trader consensus reflects this momentum from Trump administration pressure—including repeal of Lebanon's anti-normalization law—against countervailing risks like ongoing Israeli strikes on Hezbollah targets, the group's rejection of negotiations, and today's Lebanese information minister clarification that discussions remain preparatory, not formal. Odds could tip higher on scheduled follow-up summits or full truce enforcement; escalation or domestic Lebanese opposition might push toward No by May 31 resolution.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · ActualizadoIsrael x Lebanon diplomatic meeting by May 31?
Israel x Lebanon diplomatic meeting by May 31?
NUEVO
NUEVO
31 may 2026
NUEVO
NUEVO
31 may 2026
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a diplomatic meeting between representatives of Israel and Lebanon by the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A diplomatic meeting refers to a deliberate meeting between representatives of the listed countries who are acting in an official capacity and are authorized to engage in negotiation or diplomacy regarding Israel-Lebanon relations on behalf of their governments. Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify.
Brief greetings, chance encounters, or talks otherwise not deliberately aimed at diplomacy or negotiation will not count.
The meeting must be in-person (including indirect in-person meetings) and must be publicly acknowledged by either government or reported by a consensus of credible media. Remote meetings, phone calls, or other meetings where the relevant parties are not present will not count.
The resolution sources for this market will be official information from the governments of the Israel and Lebanon, and a consensus of credible reporting.US-brokered ambassador-level talks between Israel and Lebanon on April 14 and 23 in Washington marked rare direct diplomatic contacts since 1993, yielding a 10-day ceasefire extension to three weeks amid fragile border calm and Hezbollah threats. With Yes shares at 50.5%, trader consensus reflects this momentum from Trump administration pressure—including repeal of Lebanon's anti-normalization law—against countervailing risks like ongoing Israeli strikes on Hezbollah targets, the group's rejection of negotiations, and today's Lebanese information minister clarification that discussions remain preparatory, not formal. Odds could tip higher on scheduled follow-up summits or full truce enforcement; escalation or domestic Lebanese opposition might push toward No by May 31 resolution.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a diplomatic meeting between representatives of Israel and Lebanon by the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A diplomatic meeting refers to a deliberate meeting between representatives of the listed countries who are acting in an official capacity and are authorized to engage in negotiation or diplomacy regarding Israel-Lebanon relations on behalf of their governments. Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify.
Brief greetings, chance encounters, or talks otherwise not deliberately aimed at diplomacy or negotiation will not count.
The meeting must be in-person (including indirect in-person meetings) and must be publicly acknowledged by either government or reported by a consensus of credible media. Remote meetings, phone calls, or other meetings where the relevant parties are not present will not count.
The resolution sources for this market will be official information from the governments of the Israel and Lebanon, and a consensus of credible reporting.
A diplomatic meeting refers to a deliberate meeting between representatives of the listed countries who are acting in an official capacity and are authorized to engage in negotiation or diplomacy regarding Israel-Lebanon relations on behalf of their governments. Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify.
Brief greetings, chance encounters, or talks otherwise not deliberately aimed at diplomacy or negotiation will not count.
The meeting must be in-person (including indirect in-person meetings) and must be publicly acknowledged by either government or reported by a consensus of credible media. Remote meetings, phone calls, or other meetings where the relevant parties are not present will not count.
The resolution sources for this market will be official information from the governments of the Israel and Lebanon, and a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercado abierto: Apr 29, 2026, 5:00 PM ET
Volumen
$476Fecha de finalización
31 may 2026Mercado abierto
Apr 29, 2026, 5:00 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a diplomatic meeting between representatives of Israel and Lebanon by the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A diplomatic meeting refers to a deliberate meeting between representatives of the listed countries who are acting in an official capacity and are authorized to engage in negotiation or diplomacy regarding Israel-Lebanon relations on behalf of their governments. Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify.
Brief greetings, chance encounters, or talks otherwise not deliberately aimed at diplomacy or negotiation will not count.
The meeting must be in-person (including indirect in-person meetings) and must be publicly acknowledged by either government or reported by a consensus of credible media. Remote meetings, phone calls, or other meetings where the relevant parties are not present will not count.
The resolution sources for this market will be official information from the governments of the Israel and Lebanon, and a consensus of credible reporting.US-brokered ambassador-level talks between Israel and Lebanon on April 14 and 23 in Washington marked rare direct diplomatic contacts since 1993, yielding a 10-day ceasefire extension to three weeks amid fragile border calm and Hezbollah threats. With Yes shares at 50.5%, trader consensus reflects this momentum from Trump administration pressure—including repeal of Lebanon's anti-normalization law—against countervailing risks like ongoing Israeli strikes on Hezbollah targets, the group's rejection of negotiations, and today's Lebanese information minister clarification that discussions remain preparatory, not formal. Odds could tip higher on scheduled follow-up summits or full truce enforcement; escalation or domestic Lebanese opposition might push toward No by May 31 resolution.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a diplomatic meeting between representatives of Israel and Lebanon by the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A diplomatic meeting refers to a deliberate meeting between representatives of the listed countries who are acting in an official capacity and are authorized to engage in negotiation or diplomacy regarding Israel-Lebanon relations on behalf of their governments. Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify.
Brief greetings, chance encounters, or talks otherwise not deliberately aimed at diplomacy or negotiation will not count.
The meeting must be in-person (including indirect in-person meetings) and must be publicly acknowledged by either government or reported by a consensus of credible media. Remote meetings, phone calls, or other meetings where the relevant parties are not present will not count.
The resolution sources for this market will be official information from the governments of the Israel and Lebanon, and a consensus of credible reporting.
A diplomatic meeting refers to a deliberate meeting between representatives of the listed countries who are acting in an official capacity and are authorized to engage in negotiation or diplomacy regarding Israel-Lebanon relations on behalf of their governments. Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify.
Brief greetings, chance encounters, or talks otherwise not deliberately aimed at diplomacy or negotiation will not count.
The meeting must be in-person (including indirect in-person meetings) and must be publicly acknowledged by either government or reported by a consensus of credible media. Remote meetings, phone calls, or other meetings where the relevant parties are not present will not count.
The resolution sources for this market will be official information from the governments of the Israel and Lebanon, and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volumen
$476Fecha de finalización
31 may 2026Mercado abierto
Apr 29, 2026, 5:00 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...US-brokered ambassador-level talks between Israel and Lebanon on April 14 and 23 in Washington marked rare direct diplomatic contacts since 1993, yielding a 10-day ceasefire extension to three weeks amid fragile border calm and Hezbollah threats. With Yes shares at 50.5%, trader consensus reflects this momentum from Trump administration pressure—including repeal of Lebanon's anti-normalization law—against countervailing risks like ongoing Israeli strikes on Hezbollah targets, the group's rejection of negotiations, and today's Lebanese information minister clarification that discussions remain preparatory, not formal. Odds could tip higher on scheduled follow-up summits or full truce enforcement; escalation or domestic Lebanese opposition might push toward No by May 31 resolution.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes