Trader consensus favors "No" at 89% on a federal law banning sports prediction markets in 2026, driven by stalled bipartisan legislation like Sens. Schiff and Curtis's Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act (S.4160), introduced in March to prohibit CFTC-registered entities from listing sports event contracts resembling bets. Despite multiple bills and state-level scrutiny, including Minnesota's pending Senate floor vote, no committee advancement or floor votes have materialized amid congressional gridlock. The CFTC's March Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on prediction markets—comments closing April 30—prioritizes oversight on manipulation and insider trading over bans, bolstered by an April federal court ruling deeming such contracts "swaps" exempt from state gambling laws. Platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have adopted anti-insider trading rules, reducing urgency for prohibition before year-end.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado¿La ley que prohíbe los mercados de predicción deportiva promulgada en 2026?
¿La ley que prohíbe los mercados de predicción deportiva promulgada en 2026?
Sí
$10,248 Vol.
$10,248 Vol.
Sí
$10,248 Vol.
$10,248 Vol.
Any bill that prohibits federally regulated prediction markets from offering sports betting contracts, or otherwise places such activities under state-level gambling regulation rather than federal regulatory oversight, will qualify for a “Yes” resolution.
Qualifying legislation may include joint resolutions and must pass both the House and the Senate, and must be signed by the President, become law without signature while Congress remains in session, or become law through veto override. Presidential pocket vetoes that expire resolve to "No".
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the US federal government and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC); however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Mercado abierto: Mar 27, 2026, 1:53 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Any bill that prohibits federally regulated prediction markets from offering sports betting contracts, or otherwise places such activities under state-level gambling regulation rather than federal regulatory oversight, will qualify for a “Yes” resolution.
Qualifying legislation may include joint resolutions and must pass both the House and the Senate, and must be signed by the President, become law without signature while Congress remains in session, or become law through veto override. Presidential pocket vetoes that expire resolve to "No".
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the US federal government and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC); however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus favors "No" at 89% on a federal law banning sports prediction markets in 2026, driven by stalled bipartisan legislation like Sens. Schiff and Curtis's Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act (S.4160), introduced in March to prohibit CFTC-registered entities from listing sports event contracts resembling bets. Despite multiple bills and state-level scrutiny, including Minnesota's pending Senate floor vote, no committee advancement or floor votes have materialized amid congressional gridlock. The CFTC's March Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on prediction markets—comments closing April 30—prioritizes oversight on manipulation and insider trading over bans, bolstered by an April federal court ruling deeming such contracts "swaps" exempt from state gambling laws. Platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have adopted anti-insider trading rules, reducing urgency for prohibition before year-end.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes