**California Assembly Bill 2624**, which would extend privacy protections to immigration support service providers by restricting the public release of certain identifying information, passed the Assembly on a 57-19 vote in late May before moving to the Senate. As of mid-June 2026, the measure has only been referred to Senate committees on privacy, judiciary, and public safety, with no further floor action or hearings scheduled. The short remaining calendar before the June 30 deadline makes completion of the required committee review, Senate passage, any necessary reconciliation, and gubernatorial signature highly improbable under standard legislative timelines. Trader consensus reflects these procedural barriers and the absence of any emergency fast-track signals from leadership. Late-session maneuvers or an extraordinary extension remain theoretically possible but face steep institutional hurdles.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedCalifornia "Stop Nick Shirley Act" becomes law by June 30?
California "Stop Nick Shirley Act" becomes law by June 30?
NEW
NEW
Jun 30, 2026
NEW
NEW
Jun 30, 2026
This market will resolve to “Yes” if AB 2624 “Privacy for immigration support services providers” is passed by both chambers of the California State Legislature and is signed into law by the Governor, or otherwise formally becomes law in the State of California, by June 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the government of California; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
**California Assembly Bill 2624**, which would extend privacy protections to immigration support service providers by restricting the public release of certain identifying information, passed the Assembly on a 57-19 vote in late May before moving to the Senate. As of mid-June 2026, the measure has only been referred to Senate committees on privacy, judiciary, and public safety, with no further floor action or hearings scheduled. The short remaining calendar before the June 30 deadline makes completion of the required committee review, Senate passage, any necessary reconciliation, and gubernatorial signature highly improbable under standard legislative timelines. Trader consensus reflects these procedural barriers and the absence of any emergency fast-track signals from leadership. Late-session maneuvers or an extraordinary extension remain theoretically possible but face steep institutional hurdles.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if AB 2624 “Privacy for immigration support services providers” is passed by both chambers of the California State Legislature and is signed into law by the Governor, or otherwise formally becomes law in the State of California, by June 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the government of California; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the government of California; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Market Opened: Apr 16, 2026, 10:48 AM ET
Volume
$543End Date
Jun 30, 2026Market Opened
Apr 16, 2026, 10:48 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if AB 2624 “Privacy for immigration support services providers” is passed by both chambers of the California State Legislature and is signed into law by the Governor, or otherwise formally becomes law in the State of California, by June 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the government of California; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
**California Assembly Bill 2624**, which would extend privacy protections to immigration support service providers by restricting the public release of certain identifying information, passed the Assembly on a 57-19 vote in late May before moving to the Senate. As of mid-June 2026, the measure has only been referred to Senate committees on privacy, judiciary, and public safety, with no further floor action or hearings scheduled. The short remaining calendar before the June 30 deadline makes completion of the required committee review, Senate passage, any necessary reconciliation, and gubernatorial signature highly improbable under standard legislative timelines. Trader consensus reflects these procedural barriers and the absence of any emergency fast-track signals from leadership. Late-session maneuvers or an extraordinary extension remain theoretically possible but face steep institutional hurdles.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if AB 2624 “Privacy for immigration support services providers” is passed by both chambers of the California State Legislature and is signed into law by the Governor, or otherwise formally becomes law in the State of California, by June 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the government of California; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the government of California; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Volume
$543End Date
Jun 30, 2026Market Opened
Apr 16, 2026, 10:48 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...**California Assembly Bill 2624**, which would extend privacy protections to immigration support service providers by restricting the public release of certain identifying information, passed the Assembly on a 57-19 vote in late May before moving to the Senate. As of mid-June 2026, the measure has only been referred to Senate committees on privacy, judiciary, and public safety, with no further floor action or hearings scheduled. The short remaining calendar before the June 30 deadline makes completion of the required committee review, Senate passage, any necessary reconciliation, and gubernatorial signature highly improbable under standard legislative timelines. Trader consensus reflects these procedural barriers and the absence of any emergency fast-track signals from leadership. Late-session maneuvers or an extraordinary extension remain theoretically possible but face steep institutional hurdles.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated
Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions