Cuba's deepening 2026 energy and economic crisis—triggered by a U.S. oil blockade causing nationwide blackouts and food shortages—sparked protests in March, yet the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC) retains de facto control through its security forces and limited amnesties releasing some political detainees in early April. President Miguel Díaz-Canel's April interviews with NBC and others firmly rejected U.S. demands for his resignation, emphasizing dialogue without concessions, while affirming readiness to resist external pressure. Traders' 75% consensus on "No" reflects the regime's historical resilience during past crises like the 1990s Special Period, absent any recent military defection, mass uprising, or leadership fracture to signal imminent collapse before year-end. Ongoing U.S.-Cuba talks could influence dynamics, but no verified escalations have shifted odds materially in the past month.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado¿Cae el régimen cubano en 2026?
¿Cae el régimen cubano en 2026?
Sí
$184,319 Vol.
$184,319 Vol.
31 dic 2026
Sí
$184,319 Vol.
$184,319 Vol.
31 dic 2026
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC) ceases to exercise de facto governing control over Cuba by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A “Yes” resolution requires a clear and widely reported break from the PCC’s historical control over the government of Cuba. This may include events such as the overthrow or dissolution of the PCC and its replacement by a new government or transitional authority, the constitutional removal of the PCC’s status as the sole ruling party followed by a transfer of governing power to a different political entity, or the holding of multi-party national elections that result in a government not controlled by the PCC. A “Yes” resolution does not require the formal dissolution of the PCC, provided the PCC no longer exercises de facto governing control over Cuba.
Leadership changes within the PCC, including replacement of the First Secretary, or governmental reforms that preserve the PCC’s de facto governing control over Cuba, will not suffice. Partial loss of territory, civil unrest, or challenges by rebel or exile groups will not qualify unless the PCC no longer administers the majority of the Cuban population within Cuba.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Cuba's deepening 2026 energy and economic crisis—triggered by a U.S. oil blockade causing nationwide blackouts and food shortages—sparked protests in March, yet the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC) retains de facto control through its security forces and limited amnesties releasing some political detainees in early April. President Miguel Díaz-Canel's April interviews with NBC and others firmly rejected U.S. demands for his resignation, emphasizing dialogue without concessions, while affirming readiness to resist external pressure. Traders' 75% consensus on "No" reflects the regime's historical resilience during past crises like the 1990s Special Period, absent any recent military defection, mass uprising, or leadership fracture to signal imminent collapse before year-end. Ongoing U.S.-Cuba talks could influence dynamics, but no verified escalations have shifted odds materially in the past month.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC) ceases to exercise de facto governing control over Cuba by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A “Yes” resolution requires a clear and widely reported break from the PCC’s historical control over the government of Cuba. This may include events such as the overthrow or dissolution of the PCC and its replacement by a new government or transitional authority, the constitutional removal of the PCC’s status as the sole ruling party followed by a transfer of governing power to a different political entity, or the holding of multi-party national elections that result in a government not controlled by the PCC. A “Yes” resolution does not require the formal dissolution of the PCC, provided the PCC no longer exercises de facto governing control over Cuba.
Leadership changes within the PCC, including replacement of the First Secretary, or governmental reforms that preserve the PCC’s de facto governing control over Cuba, will not suffice. Partial loss of territory, civil unrest, or challenges by rebel or exile groups will not qualify unless the PCC no longer administers the majority of the Cuban population within Cuba.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
A “Yes” resolution requires a clear and widely reported break from the PCC’s historical control over the government of Cuba. This may include events such as the overthrow or dissolution of the PCC and its replacement by a new government or transitional authority, the constitutional removal of the PCC’s status as the sole ruling party followed by a transfer of governing power to a different political entity, or the holding of multi-party national elections that result in a government not controlled by the PCC. A “Yes” resolution does not require the formal dissolution of the PCC, provided the PCC no longer exercises de facto governing control over Cuba.
Leadership changes within the PCC, including replacement of the First Secretary, or governmental reforms that preserve the PCC’s de facto governing control over Cuba, will not suffice. Partial loss of territory, civil unrest, or challenges by rebel or exile groups will not qualify unless the PCC no longer administers the majority of the Cuban population within Cuba.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercado abierto: Mar 10, 2026, 7:56 PM ET
Volumen
$184,319Fecha de finalización
31 dic 2026Mercado abierto
Mar 10, 2026, 7:56 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC) ceases to exercise de facto governing control over Cuba by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A “Yes” resolution requires a clear and widely reported break from the PCC’s historical control over the government of Cuba. This may include events such as the overthrow or dissolution of the PCC and its replacement by a new government or transitional authority, the constitutional removal of the PCC’s status as the sole ruling party followed by a transfer of governing power to a different political entity, or the holding of multi-party national elections that result in a government not controlled by the PCC. A “Yes” resolution does not require the formal dissolution of the PCC, provided the PCC no longer exercises de facto governing control over Cuba.
Leadership changes within the PCC, including replacement of the First Secretary, or governmental reforms that preserve the PCC’s de facto governing control over Cuba, will not suffice. Partial loss of territory, civil unrest, or challenges by rebel or exile groups will not qualify unless the PCC no longer administers the majority of the Cuban population within Cuba.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Cuba's deepening 2026 energy and economic crisis—triggered by a U.S. oil blockade causing nationwide blackouts and food shortages—sparked protests in March, yet the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC) retains de facto control through its security forces and limited amnesties releasing some political detainees in early April. President Miguel Díaz-Canel's April interviews with NBC and others firmly rejected U.S. demands for his resignation, emphasizing dialogue without concessions, while affirming readiness to resist external pressure. Traders' 75% consensus on "No" reflects the regime's historical resilience during past crises like the 1990s Special Period, absent any recent military defection, mass uprising, or leadership fracture to signal imminent collapse before year-end. Ongoing U.S.-Cuba talks could influence dynamics, but no verified escalations have shifted odds materially in the past month.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC) ceases to exercise de facto governing control over Cuba by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A “Yes” resolution requires a clear and widely reported break from the PCC’s historical control over the government of Cuba. This may include events such as the overthrow or dissolution of the PCC and its replacement by a new government or transitional authority, the constitutional removal of the PCC’s status as the sole ruling party followed by a transfer of governing power to a different political entity, or the holding of multi-party national elections that result in a government not controlled by the PCC. A “Yes” resolution does not require the formal dissolution of the PCC, provided the PCC no longer exercises de facto governing control over Cuba.
Leadership changes within the PCC, including replacement of the First Secretary, or governmental reforms that preserve the PCC’s de facto governing control over Cuba, will not suffice. Partial loss of territory, civil unrest, or challenges by rebel or exile groups will not qualify unless the PCC no longer administers the majority of the Cuban population within Cuba.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
A “Yes” resolution requires a clear and widely reported break from the PCC’s historical control over the government of Cuba. This may include events such as the overthrow or dissolution of the PCC and its replacement by a new government or transitional authority, the constitutional removal of the PCC’s status as the sole ruling party followed by a transfer of governing power to a different political entity, or the holding of multi-party national elections that result in a government not controlled by the PCC. A “Yes” resolution does not require the formal dissolution of the PCC, provided the PCC no longer exercises de facto governing control over Cuba.
Leadership changes within the PCC, including replacement of the First Secretary, or governmental reforms that preserve the PCC’s de facto governing control over Cuba, will not suffice. Partial loss of territory, civil unrest, or challenges by rebel or exile groups will not qualify unless the PCC no longer administers the majority of the Cuban population within Cuba.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volumen
$184,319Fecha de finalización
31 dic 2026Mercado abierto
Mar 10, 2026, 7:56 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Cuba's deepening 2026 energy and economic crisis—triggered by a U.S. oil blockade causing nationwide blackouts and food shortages—sparked protests in March, yet the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC) retains de facto control through its security forces and limited amnesties releasing some political detainees in early April. President Miguel Díaz-Canel's April interviews with NBC and others firmly rejected U.S. demands for his resignation, emphasizing dialogue without concessions, while affirming readiness to resist external pressure. Traders' 75% consensus on "No" reflects the regime's historical resilience during past crises like the 1990s Special Period, absent any recent military defection, mass uprising, or leadership fracture to signal imminent collapse before year-end. Ongoing U.S.-Cuba talks could influence dynamics, but no verified escalations have shifted odds materially in the past month.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes